The
swordsmen of feudal Japan practiced their art with the utmost
intensity. In battle, success or failure was usually decided in a
split second. There were rarely any second-place winners. A single
blow would decide the outcome of the conflict. If their technique
failed, the result was certain; they wouldn't be joining their
families to enjoy a second helping of Mom's rice pudding. If the
technique was successful, they'd live to fight another day.
A tiger
approaches its prey very carefully. Every movement is calculated and
precise. The movements are small, some are almost imperceptible as
the tiger focuses on what it is about to do. If it fails to bring
down its quarry, it may not get another chance to eat for a couple of
days or more!
Both
the swordsman and the tiger appear to be relaxed. There's no
fidgeting around, no bouncing up and down. They are what we call
“centered.” Can you imagine what would happen if the swordsman
started bouncing round, or began jiggling his sword? I can. It
would be a very, very short fight.
When
many of the martial disciplines became “sportified”, we began to
see a lot of twiddling, jiggling, and wiggling coming into play. The
duel was no longer a matter of survival; it was (and still is) simply
a question of who wins the game this time. The operative phrase in
that last sentence is, “this time.” When one contestant loses,
he can always try it again at the next tournament. However, this was
not the case for the feudal warrior. If he lost, he lost it all.
In the
traditional martial forms of China, Okinawa, and Japan, movement is
never performed for its own sake. That is, you don't move just to be
moving. Each and every movement, even small shifts of the feet, are
done for a reason. Energy is conserved and the trained fighter
represents the very essence of economy. The breath is controlled and
calm, movements are never wasted.
If the
enemy should attack suddenly, the fighter must be able to respond in
an instant. This doesn't necessarily mean that he simply avoids the
incoming blow(s); he must be able to respond and take advantage of
this”window of opportunity.” He knows that within every
movement, no matter how slight, there is a moment of vulnerability.
If the movement is small, the “window” is likewise small.
However, if the “window” is large enough and he is in precisely
the right place at exactly the right moment, he can slip through it
and bring his opponent down. Naturally, if he is hopping around like
a rabbit on steroids or busily fidgeting about like a young man on
his first date, he will be unable to breach the “window” and any
attempt to do so would probably end in disaster.
I can
see the young man in the back waving his hand excitedly. Is there a
fire? Oh, you have a question...okay, fire away. You say that
boxers stay on the balls of their feet and bounce and weave to
confuse the opponent? And you say that they believe that a moving
target is harder to hit? Well, let's have a look at your query...
I'll start with a question of my own. What is the purpose of a
boxing match? What is each contestant trying to do?
You say
that they're trying to knock out the opponent? Well, that's only
partially true. You see, the objective is not necessarily to render
the opponent unconscious; the objective is to
win! And you don't necessarily need
to knock anyone out in order to win the bout, right? Right. That's
because boxing is a game.
There's a winner and a loser. At the end of the match, both
competitors shake hands and go home to nurse their bruises. However,
real combat is not a game. It's about “not losing.” It's about
survival. In a life-and-death struggle there can be only one
survivor (and sometimes, there are no survivors). There are no
rules, no “points”, no referees, and no rounds. It ends when one
of the participants dies.
Now,
let's address the idea of bouncing around so as to confuse the
opponent and to present him with a target that is difficult to hit.
A trained fighter won't be at all confused by his enemy's movements.
He remains focused on his intended target without any expectations.
Secondly, a moving target is not at all difficult to hit. Remember
what I said about each movement presenting a “window of
opportunity?” A fighter who prances around is presenting his foe
with numerous “windows” and sooner or later, the enemy will find
one that's well within his timing and the fight will end abruptly.
Yes,
I'm aware that there have been contests pitting boxers and even
wrestlers against practitioners of various martial disciplines and
the boxers or wrestlers frequently win. These have all been fools
games, with “games” being the key word. No one was ever killed.
The rules were fairly stringent so as to avoid serious injuries.
However, traditional martial arts were never intended to be practiced
as games. I wonder what the outcome would have been if no protective
gear was worn – no gloves or footpads, no groin cups, no
mouthpieces. And what if there had been no rules whatsoever?
Combatant would be allowed to use any and all techniques at their
disposal, including kicks to the legs, seizing techniques, biting,
and whatever else came to mind. And what if there were no rounds?
The fighters couldn't rest until the fight was finished. And what if
the fight would end only when one of the combatants was killed? It
would certainly make for a completely different approach to the
match, don't you think?
In real
martial arts, nothing is wasted. The feudal swordsman appears to be
relaxed and calm as he faces his enemy. His movements are slight and
made only when necessary. His mind is focused. When the window
slides open he'll dart through in an instant and maybe, just maybe,
he'll go home when it's over.
No comments:
Post a Comment