by Phillip
Star
In the
classic martial arts movie, “Enter the Dragon”, the famous
martial arts actor of the day, Bruce Lee, faced off against the
opposition's main axe-man who began the match by tossing a board into
the air and breaking it with a quick thrust. “Boards don't hit
back”, Lee sneered...and then went on to pummel his foe into the
ground. Another well-known martial arts figure once stated that,
“Bricks and boards give a resounding thwack, but bricks and boards
don't hit back.”
True
enough. I've heard the same thing from numerous martial arts
teachers over the years but I always wondered if they'd ever
considered that heavy bags and striking posts don't back, either. I
realize that they were saying simply that the ability to break
various objects with the bare hands and feet are not necessarily
indicative of one's martial skill in so far as fighting is concerned,
but then...neither is striking the heavy bag. I think that people
who makes such statements are missing the point. After all,
silhouette targets that are used by firearms enthusiasts don't shoot
back, either...
They
would likely argue that hitting the heavy bag fosters the development
of strong technique (if it's done correctly... and a great many
people use it incorrectly). I think I would counter with the same
argument regarding board and brick breaking. More importantly, the
breaking techniques promote the development of a strong spirit and
teach practitioners how to extend their yi (mind, intention,
will...), which isn't always the case with using pieces of equipment
like the heavy bag. Different training devices assist in the
development of different aspects of a chosen martial discipline;
there is no single piece of equipment that helps to develop all of
them.
The
legendary Masutatsu (“Mas”) Oyama, founder of the Kyokushin style
of Japanese karate, emphasized the importance of the breaking
techniques because he regarded them as invaluable aids in the
promotion of a strong spirit. Although he said that they can be used
as a sort of barometer by which we can measure the power of a given
technique, the main idea was the development of an indomitable spirit
and it is this point that so many contemporary practitioners miss.
If you
fail to make a particular break, it's because:
- Your technique is flawed one way or another
- You failed to extend your yi properly, or
- Your spirit is weak
Or any
combination thereof. All of these things are necessary for the
development of real fighting skill. At the same time, you can hit
the heavy bag incorrectly (which is something that many people do
everyday without knowing it), you can strike it without extending
your yi (ditto), and it does not necessarily reflect a lack of
spirit. So there.
The
breaking techniques were not intended to be used as a form of
showmanship. Back in the old days it was practiced primarily in the
training hall, out of sight of the public at large. It was when the
martial arts were brought to the West that these practice routines
were used to enthrall audiences. The idea snowballed and before
long, we had people performing all kinds of breaking techniques that
had little to no value as far as training goes, but the public loved
them! Of course, the same happened with freestyle sparring and the
demonstrations of forms.
So, to
those who say that breaking techniques are without value, I say,
“take a closer look.” You'll be surprised at what you find...